Yield of abdominal radiographs in children with suspected intussusception; rate of pneumoperitoneum and other abdominal pathology.

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound is the criterion standard imaging modality for the diagnosis of intussusception. However, to our knowledge the utility of abdominal radiographs to concurrently screen for pneumoperitoneum or other abdominal pathology that could have a similar presentation has not been studied. Our institutional protocol requires the performance of AP supine and left lateral decubitus views of the abdomen prior to ultrasound evaluation for intussusception, providing an opportunity to examine the yield of abdominal radiographs in this setting. Our primary objective was to determine the rate of pneumoperitoneum on screening abdominal radiographs in children undergoing evaluation for intussusception. Our secondary objective was to determine the rate that other clinically significant pathology is found on these screening abdominal radiographs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients under 6 years of age who had any imaging ordered in our large urban pediatric emergency department to evaluate for suspected intussusception during the calendar years 2018-2020. RESULTS: 1115 patient encounters met our inclusion criteria. Among 1090 who had screening abdominal radiographs, 82 (8%) had findings concerning for intussusception. Of those not concerning for intussusception, 635 (58%) were read as normal, 263 (24%) showed moderate to large stool burden, 107 (10%) showed generalized bowel distention, and 22 (2%) showed abnormal gastric distention. Individually the remainder of all other findings compromised <1% of encounters and included radiopaque foreign body (8), intraabdominal calcification (4), pneumonia/effusion (3), pneumatosis intestinalis, abdominal mass (2), diaphragmatic hernia (1), rib fracture (1), appendicolith (1), feeding tube malposition (1), and bowel wall thickening (1). In one encounter the patient had a bowel perforation with pneumoperitoneum present secondary to ingestion of multiple magnets. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that radiograph-detected pneumoperitoneum is rare in children with suspected intussusception. Constipation is the most common abnormal finding on screening radiographs. Other findings occur in approximately 15% of total cases, some of which require further workup.

Pharmacobezoar: a rare cause of body packing misdiagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of body packing based on the misinterpretation of imaging is rare. CASE REPORT: An unaccompanied 55-year-old woman presented with uncontrolled vomiting in the airport transit area. An abdominal radiograph and computed tomography scan revealed multiple radiopaque foreign bodies in the colon. History was unobtainable due to the language barrier. The patient was referred to our institution as a body packer who required surgical extraction of the packets. In the absence of symptoms, she was managed conservatively with antiemetic drugs and whole bowel irrigation. The final diagnosis was radiopaque pharmacobezoars caused by an over-the-counter barium-containing anticancer medication in the setting of severe hypokalemia-associated paralytic ileus following post-chemotherapy vomiting. After the correction of her potassium concentration, the patient was discharged and resumed her trip. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be warned that pharmacobezoars might be mistaken for drug packets on abdominal imaging leading to body packing misdiagnosis.

Utilizing ultrasound in suspected necrotizing enterocolitis with equivocal radiographic findings.

BACKGROUND: To examine the use of abdominal ultrasound (AUS) as a diagnostic adjunct in the diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in cases where abdominal radiography (AXR) is equivocal in order to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use in neonates. METHODS: Retrospective study (2017-2019) of infants undergoing NEC evaluation with equivocal AXR findings (n = 54). Paired AXR and AUS were reviewed with respect to presence or absence of pneumatosis. Concordance of AUS findings with decision to treat for NEC was evaluated. RESULTS: Among 54 infants where AXR was equivocal, AUS demonstrated presence of pneumatosis in 22 patients (41%), absence of pneumatosis in 31 patients (57%), and was equivocal in 1 patient. All patients with pneumatosis on AUS were treated for NEC. Of 31 patients without pneumatosis on AUS, 25 patients (78%) were not treated for NEC. Patients without pneumatosis on AUS received a significantly shorter mean duration of antibiotics compared to those with pneumatosis (3.3 days (+/- 4.8 days) vs 12.4 days (+/- 4.7 days)); p < 0.001). Of those patients not treated, none required treatment within 1 week following negative AUS. CONCLUSION: AUS is a valuable tool for evaluating the presence or absence of pneumatosis in the setting of equivocal AXR. Absence of pneumatosis on AUS informs clinical decision making and reduces unnecessary treatment and antibiotic usage.

Oncology-specific radiation dose and image noise reference levels in adult abdominal-pelvic CT.

OBJECTIVES: To provide our oncology-specific adult abdominal-pelvic CT reference levels for image noise and radiation dose from a high-volume, oncologic, tertiary referral center. METHODS: The portal venous phase abdomen-pelvis acquisition was assessed for image noise and radiation dose in 13,320 contrast-enhanced CT examinations. Patient size (effective diameter) and radiation dose (CTDIvol) were recorded using a commercial software system, and image noise (Global Noise metric) was quantified using a custom processing system. The reference level and range for dose and noise were calculated for the full dataset, and for examinations grouped by CT scanner model. Dose and noise reference levels were also calculated for exams grouped by five different patient size categories. RESULTS: The noise reference level was 11.25 HU with a reference range of 10.25-12.25 HU. The dose reference level at a median effective diameter of 30.7 cm was 26.7 mGy with a reference range of 19.6-37.0 mGy. Dose increased with patient size; however, image noise remained approximately constant within the noise reference range. The doses were 2.1-2.5 times than the doses in the ACR DIR registry for corresponding patient sizes. The image noise was 0.63-0.75 times the previously published reference level in abdominal-pelvic CT examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Our oncology-specific abdominal-pelvic CT dose reference levels are higher than in the ACR dose index registry and our oncology-specific image noise reference levels are lower than previously proposed image noise reference levels. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study reports reference image noise and radiation dose levels appropriate for the indication of abdomen-pelvis CT examination for cancer diagnosis and staging. The difference in these reference levels from non-oncology-specific CT examinations highlight a need for indication-specific, dose index and image quality reference registries.

[Functional MRI of the pelvic floor]. / Funktionelle MRT des Beckenbodens.

Due to the complexity of pelvic floor dysfunctions and the frequent interdisciplinary findings, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide valuable (additional) information for the clinical examination in other disciplines through a comprehensive morphological and functional representation of the pelvic floor. It has therefore largely replaced conventional defecography under fluoroscopy in clinical practice. In order to increase the effectiveness and communication between radiology and the other specialist disciplines, recommendations for the standardized implementation and results of dynamic MRI were published by the European Society for Urogenital radiology (ESUR) in 2016 and based on these the Society for Abdominal Radiology (SAR) published simplified recommendations in 2019 for routine clinical use.

Delays in imaging diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in the emergency setting.

Acute abdominal pain is a common cause of ED visits and often requires imaging to identify a specific diagnosis. Prompt and appropriate imaging plays a crucial role in patient management and leads to improved patient outcomes, decreased hospital stay, and improved ED workflow. There are many cases of abdominal pain in the ED with delayed diagnosis and management secondary to a combination of institutional policies and knowledge deficits in current imaging guidelines. Inappropriate use of abdominal radiographs, use of oral contrast for CT abdomen and pelvis, and concern for iodinated contrast-induced acute kidney injury are three of the more commonly encountered roadblocks to prompt imaging diagnosis of abdominal pain. The purpose of this review is to discuss why these potential causes of delayed diagnosis occur and how radiologists can help improve both imaging and ED workflow by utilizing the most up-to-date imaging guidelines such the American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria and ACR Manual on Contrast Media to assist clinicians working in the emergency setting.

Diagnostic values of supine and erect abdominal radiographs for patients with acute abdomen: which is better for decision making?

BACKGROUND: Plain abdominal radiography including supine and erect abdominal radiographs (SAR and EAR) is a frequently used image modality for preliminary evaluation of acute abdomen. We aimed to explore which one of the SAR or EAR has a higher diagnostic value in overall diagnosis of acute abdomen, including their respective advantages over each other for the various underlying diseases. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the imaging findings of plain abdominal radiography of patients with acute abdomen who received abdominal computed tomography (CT) within 24 hours at the emergency department of a medical center in northern Taiwan between October 2019 and February 2020. Final diagnosis was made by CT reports and clinical data. The relevance between the imaging findings and clinical diagnosis in the groups of SAR and EAR were compared. RESULTS: A total of 1009 cases with acute abdomen were included, of which 341 (33.8%) underwent EAR and 668 (66.2%) underwent SAR. Among them, 820 cases had final diagnosis confirmed by CT and clinical data. In comparison of the diagnostic relevance of SAR and EAR, there were no significant difference in the overall acute abdomen, but EAR showed a better diagnostic relevance in cases with bowel obstruction than SAR did (100% vs 87.2%, p < 0.05). No statistical difference in other abdominal diseases. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between SAR and EAR in evaluation of overall acute abdomen. However, EARs has a diagnostic advantage over SAR for evaluation of suspected bowel obstruction.

Evaluating suspected small bowel obstruction with the water-soluble contrast challenge.

With optimized technique, the water-soluble contrast challenge is effective at triaging patients for operative vs non-operative management of suspected small bowel obstruction. Standardized study structure and interpretation guidelines aid in clinical efficacy and ease of use. Many tips and tricks exist regarding technique and interpretation, and their understanding may assist the interpreting radiologist. In the future, a CT-based water-soluble contrast challenge, utilizing oral contrast given as part of the initial CT examination, might allow for a more streamlined algorithm and provide more rapid results.

Early Prediction of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Using Clinical and Abdominal CT Features.

Background Assessment of the biliary origin of acute pancreatitis (AP) is crucial because it affects patient treatment to avoid recurrence. Although CT is systematically performed to determine severity in AP, its usefulness in assessing AP biliary origin has not been evaluated. Purpose To assess abdominal CT features associated with acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) and to evaluate the predictive value of a combination of CT and clinical data for determining a biliary origin in a first episode of AP. Materials and Methods From December 2014 to May 2019, all consecutive patients who presented with a first episode of AP and with at least 6 months of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Evidence of gallstones was mandatory for a clinical diagnosis of ABP. Abdominal CT images were reviewed by two abdominal radiologists. Univariable and multivariable statistical analyses were performed, and a nomogram was constructed on the basis of the combination of clinical and CT features. This nomogram was validated in a further independent internal cohort of patients. Results A total of 271 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 56 years ± 20; 160 men) were evaluated. Of these, 170 (63%) had ABP. At multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.09; P < .001), alanine aminotransferase level (OR, 1.00; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.01; P = .009), gallbladder gallstone (OR, 15.59; 95% CI: 4.61, 68.62; P < .001), choledochal ring sign (OR, 5.73; 95% CI: 2.11, 17.05; P < .001), liver spontaneous attenuation (OR, 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.11; P < .001), and duodenal thickening (OR, 0.17; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.61; P = .01) were independently associated with ABP. The matching nomogram combining both clinical and CT features displayed an area under the curve of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.97) in the study sample (n = 271) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.99) in the validation cohort (n = 51). Conclusion Abdominal CT provided useful features for diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). Combining CT and clinical features in a nomogram showed good diagnostic performance for early diagnosis of ABP. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Chang in this issue.

Optimisation of the AP abdomen projection for larger patient body thicknesses.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to identify optimal exposure parameters, delivering the lowest radiation dose while maintaining images of diagnostic quality for the antero-posterior (AP) abdomen x-ray projection in large patients with an AP abdominal diameter of >22.3 cm. METHODOLOGY: The study was composed of two phases. In phase 1, an anthropomorphic phantom (20 cm AP abdominal diameter) was repetitively radiographed while adding 3 layers (5 cm thick each) of fat onto the phantom reaching a maximum AP abdominal diameter of 35 cm. For every 5 cm thickness, images were taken at 10 kVp (kilovoltage peak) intervals, starting from 80 kVp as the standard protocol currently in use at the local medical imaging department, to 120 kVp in combination with the use of automatic exposure control (AEC). The dose area product (DAP), milliampere-second (mAs) delivered by the AEC, and measurements to calculate the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were recorded. Phase 2 included image quality evaluation of the resultant images by radiographers and radiologists through absolute visual grading analysis (VGA). The resultant VGA scores were analysed using visual grading characteristics (VGC) curves. RESULTS: The optimal kVp setting for AP abdominal diameters at: 20 cm, 25 cm and 30 cm was found to be 110 kVp increased from 80 kVp as the standard protocol (with a 56.5% decrease in DAP and 76.2% in mAs, a 54.2% decrease in DAP and 76.2% decrease in mAs and a 29.2% decrease in DAP and 59.7% decrease in mAs, respectively). The optimal kVp setting for AP abdominal diameter at 35 cm was found to be 120 kVp increased from 80 kvp as the standard protocol (with a 50.7% decrease in DAP and 73.4% decrease in mAs). All this was achieved while maintaining images of diagnostic quality. CONCLUSION: Tailoring the exposure parameters for large patients in radiography of the abdomen results in a significant reductions in DAP which correlates to lower patient doses while still maintaining diagnostic image quality. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: This research study and resultant parameters may help guide clinical departments to optimise AP abdomen radiographic exposures for large patients in the clinical setting.

Digital variance angiography allows about 70% decrease of DSA-related radiation exposure in lower limb X-ray angiography.

Our aim was to investigate whether the previously observed higher contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and better image quality of Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) - compared to Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) - can be used to reduce radiation exposure in lower limb X-ray angiography. This prospective study enrolled 30 peripheral artery disease patients (mean ± SD age 70 ± 8 years) undergoing diagnostic angiography. In all patients, both normal (1.2 µGy/frame; 100%) and low-dose (0.36 µGy/frame; 30%) protocols were used for the acquisition of images in three anatomical regions (abdominal, femoral, crural). The CNR of DSA and DVA images were calculated, and the visual quality was evaluated by seven specialists using a 5-grade Likert scale. For investigating non-inferiority, the difference of low-dose DVA and normal dose DSA scores (DVA30-DSA100) was analyzed. DVA produced two- to three-fold CNR and significantly higher visual score than DSA. DVA30 proved to be superior to DSA100 in the crural region (difference 0.25 ± 0.07, p < 0.001), and there was no significant difference in the femoral (- 0.08 ± 0.06, p = 0.435) and abdominal (- 0.10 ± 0.09, p = 0.350) regions. Our data show that DVA allows about 70% reduction of DSA-related radiation exposure in lower limb X-ray angiography, providing a potential new radiation protection tool for the patients and the medical staff.

Clinical Artificial Intelligence Applications in Radiology: Chest and Abdomen.

Organ segmentation, chest radiograph classification, and lung and liver nodule detections are some of the popular artificial intelligence (AI) tasks in chest and abdominal radiology due to the wide availability of public datasets. AI algorithms have achieved performance comparable to humans in less time for several organ segmentation tasks, and some lesion detection and classification tasks. This article introduces the current published articles of AI applied to chest and abdominal radiology, including organ segmentation, lesion detection, classification, and predicting prognosis.

Impact of Image Reconstruction Parameters on Abdominal Aortic Calcification Measurement Using Abdominal Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is correlated with cardiovascular outcomes independent of traditional risk factors. Quantification of AAC on computed tomography (CT) has not been standardized. Reconstruction parameters have been shown to impact coronary calcium scores. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of abdominal CT reconstruction parameters, slice thickness (ST), and display field of view (DFOV) on AAC quantitative scoring on abdominal CT examinations. METHODS: We retrospectively measured AAC on noncontrast CT of 46 patients (mean age, 64.1 years; 35 males) using 5 different reconstruction protocols with a range of ST and DFOV: protocol A, 2.5 mm ST, 35 cm DFOV; protocol B, 2.5 mm ST, 50 cm DFOV; protocol C, 2.5 mm ST, 25 cm DFOV; protocol D, 5 mm ST, 35 cm DFOV; and protocol E: 0.625 mm ST, 35 cm DFOV. The AAC scores from each protocol were compared using concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman agreement analyses. RESULTS: The AAC mean (SD) scores for each protocol were as follows: A, 2022 (2418); B, 2022 (2412); C, 1939 (2310); D, 2220 (2695); and E, 1862 (2234). The AAC mean score differences between protocols and reference protocol A were -0.47, 82.01, -198.94, and 160 for protocols B, C, D, and E, respectively, with differences between protocols C to E statistically significantly different (P < 0.05). The different protocols showed overall excellent correlation (concordance correlation coefficient, >0.9) between AAC scores. CONCLUSIONS: Slice thickness and DFOV can impact AAC score measurement. A description of reconstruction parameters is important to allow comparisons across different cohorts.

Comparative Safety of Endoscopic vs Radiological Gastrostomy Tube Placement: Outcomes From a Large, Nationwide Veterans Affairs Database.

INTRODUCTION: A gastrostomy is generally performed in patients who are unable to maintain volitional intake of food. We compared outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and interventional radiologist-guided gastrostomy (IRG) using an integrated nationwide database. METHODS: Using the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure database, patients who underwent PEG or IRG from 2011 through 2021 were selected using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes. The primary outcome was the comparative incidence of adverse events between PEG and IRG. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality. Comorbidities were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes, and adjusted odds ratio (OR) for adverse events were calculated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 23,566 (70.7 ± 10.2 years) patients underwent PEG and 9,715 (69.6 ± 9.7 years) underwent IRG. Selected frequent indications for PEG vs IRG were as follows: stroke, 6.8% vs 5.3%, P < 0.01; aspiration pneumonia, 10.9% vs 6.8%, P < 0.001; feeding difficulties, 9.8% vs 6.3%, P < 0.01; and upper aerodigestive tract malignancies 58.8% vs 79.8%, P < 0.01. Across all subtypes of malignancies of the head and neck and foregut, the proportion of patients undergoing IRG was greater than those undergoing PEG (P < 0.001). The all-cause 30-day mortality and overall incidence of adverse events were significantly lower for PEG compared with those for IRG (PEG vs IRG): all-cause 30-day mortality, 9.35% vs 10.3% (OR 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.87; P < 0.01); perforation of the colon, 0.12% vs 0.24% (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.29-0.86; P = 0.04); peritonitis, 1.9% vs 2.7% (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.58-0.79; P < 0.01); and hemorrhage 1.6% vs 1% (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.18-1.83; P < 0.01). DISCUSSION: In a large nationwide database of more than 33,000 gastrostomy procedures, PEG was associated with a lower incidence of adverse outcomes and the 30-day mortality than IRG.

Can plain film radiography improve the emergency department detection of clinically important urinary stones?

OBJECTIVE: Physicians frequently use ultrasound to assess hydronephrosis in patients with suspected renal colic, but ultrasound has limited diagnostic sensitivity and rarely clarifies stone size or location. Consequently, up to 80% of emergency department (ED) renal colic patients undergo confirmatory CT imaging. Our goal was to estimate x-ray sensitivity for urinary stones and determine whether x-ray substantially improves stone detection (sensitivity) compared to hydronephrosis assessment alone. METHODS: We reviewed imaging reports from all renal colic patients who underwent x-ray and CT at four EDs. For each patient, we documented stone size, location and hydronephrosis severity on CT and whether stones were identified on x-ray. We considered moderate and severe hydronephrosis (MS-Hydro) as significant positive findings, then calculated the sensitivity (detection rate) of MS-Hydro and x-ray for large stones ≥5 mm and for stones likely to require intervention (all ureteral stones >7 mm and proximal or middle stones >5 mm). We then tested a diagnostic algorithm adding x-ray to hydronephrosis assessment. RESULTS: Among 1026 patients with 1527 stones, MS-Hydro sensitivity was 39% for large stones and 60% for interventional stones. X-ray sensitivity was 46% for large stones and 52% for interventional stones. Adding x-ray to hydronephrosis assessment increased sensitivity in all stone categories, specifically from 39% to 68% for large stones (gain = 29%; 95%CI, 23% to 35%) and from 60% to 82% for interventional stones (gain = 22%; 95%CI, 13% to 30%). Because CT and ultrasound show strong agreement for MS-Hydro identification, physicians who depend on ultrasound-based hydronephrosis assessment could achieve similar gains by adding x-ray. CONCLUSIONS: Adding x-ray to hydronephrosis assessment substantially improves diagnostic sensitivity, enabling the detection of nearly 70% of large stones and over 80% of interventional stones. This level of sensitivity may be sufficient to reassure physicians about a renal colic diagnosis without CT imaging for many patients.

Evaluation of Abdominal Computed Tomography Scans for Differentiating the Discrepancies in Abdominal Adipose Tissue Between Two Major Subtypes of Primary Aldosteronism.

The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in the distribution of abdominal adipose tissue between the two subtypes of primary aldosteronism (PA) using abdominal computed tomography. We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed as having essential hypertension (EH) or PA from the prospectively collected Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation (TAIPAI) database. Patients with PA were divided into the subgroups of idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA) and unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA). Patients' basic clinicodemographic data were collected, and a self-developed CT-based software program was used to quantify the abdominal adiposity indexes, including visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area, VAT ratio, waist circumference (WC), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) area, and SAT ratio. We included 190 patients with EH and 436 patients with PA (238 with IHA and 198 with APA). The APA group had significantly lower abdominal adiposity indexes than the other groups. We also found negative correlations of aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) with VAT area, VAT ratio, WC, and body mass index (BMI) in the APA group. After propensity score matching (which left 184 patients each in the IHA and APA groups), patients in the APA group still had significantly lower WC, SAT area, SAT ratio, and VAT ratio than those in the IHA group. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis indicated that lower probability of abdominal obesity was significantly related to patients with APA. Our data revealed that the distribution of abdominal adipose tissue was similar in patients with IHA and those with EH, but the abdominal adiposity indexes were significantly lower in patients with APA than in those with IHA and EH.

Superior objective and subjective image quality of deep learning reconstruction for low-dose abdominal CT imaging in comparison with model-based iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct objective and subjective comparisons of image quality among abdominal computed tomography (CT) reconstructions with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithms, model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and filtered back projection (FBP). METHODS: Datasets from consecutive patients who underwent low-dose liver CT were retrospectively identified. Images were reconstructed using DLR, MBIR, and FBP. Mean image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated, and noise, artifacts, sharpness, and overall image quality were subjectively assessed. Dunnett's test was used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Ninety patients (67 ± 12.7 years; 63 males; mean body mass index [BMI], 25.5 kg/m2) were included. The mean noise in the abdominal aorta and hepatic parenchyma of DLR was lower than that in FBP and MBIR (p < .001). For FBP and MBIR, image noise was significantly higher for obese patients than for those with normal BMI. The CNR for the abdominal aorta and hepatic parenchyma was higher for DLR than for FBP and MBIR (p < .001). MBIR images were subjectively rated as superior to FBP images in terms of noise, artifacts, sharpness, and overall quality (p < .001). DLR images were rated as superior to MBIR images in terms of noise (p < .001) and overall quality (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Based on objective and subjective comparisons, the image quality of DLR was found to be superior to that of MBIR and FBP on low-dose abdominal CT. DLR was the only method for which image noise was not higher for obese patients than for those with a normal BMI. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study provides previously unavailable information on the properties of DLR systems and their clinical utility.